Friday, October 11, 2013

Managed Media Controversy

English: Diagram showing the steps of the scie...English: Diagram showing the steps of the scientific method. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: "Lebanon's Scientific Research C...English: "Lebanon's Scientific Research Center" Organization's Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Why the media has gone silent on climate change

Friends of Science

Euronais

Still waiting for greenhouse

What Really Happened - Climategate

Guerrilla  Media Network
The Libya Secret: How West Cooked Up “People’s Uprising”

Whistleblower Information
Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present -- and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

Congress, Corruption, Cover-ups and Government Oversight Agencies Gone Wild


Searching for Jesus

“Iran Derangement Syndrome”

Iran's plants, at Natanz, where uranium is enriched to 5 percent, and at Fordow, where it is enriched to 20 percent - both below weapons grade - are under constant U.N. monitoring. Iran has offered to surrender its 20 percent uranium and cease enriching to that level, if the West will provide isotopes for its nuclear medicine and lift some of the more onerous sanctions. No deal, says the United States. Iran must give up enrichment entirely and indefinitely. This is the sticking point in the negotiations. Iran contends that as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, she has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. On this, the Iranian people stand behind their government. Should this deadlock be a cause for war?
The "Financial Times'" Gideon Rachman argues that our obsession with Iran is obscuring a far greater potential threat. Pakistan possesses perhaps 100 nuclear bombs and is building more, and anti-Americanism there is far more rampant than in Iran. Seven in 10 Pakistanis regard America as an enemy. And the drone strikes ramped up by President Obama, which have taken the lives of many innocent Pakistanis, have increased the animosity.
Yet, U.S. planes and warships are heading into the Persian Gulf, as 44 U.S. senators have urged the president to break off talks with Tehran, toughen the sanctions even further and prepare for war. Meanwhile, Iran is testing missiles that can hit Israel and U.S. bases, and its large fleet of missile boats is exercising in the Gulf.

Otto von Bismarck said that preventive war was like committing suicide out of fear of death.
I have found this to be one of the better tid bits of Iran/West history pieces.
http://www.lobelog.com/strait-history/

Here is another nice dot to connect the geopolitical insanity of the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj-o_nx5j3I&feature=player_embedded
It is very good. However, I find it a bit off track of your piece.
" Negotiate with Iran's leaders for verifiable guarantees that she is not moving to nuclear weapons "
There are oddities about this proposition that stand out. First, it is impossible to confirm a negative state. The best one can do is report unsuccessful search for positive results. Going from there, then, one should be faced with the realization that thousands of unsuccessful searches have been made.
Huh ? Iran co-sponsored the NPT in the first place. The IAEA was in fact funded by Iran, North Korea and Iraq as well as a multitude of other nations. When sanctions were levied against these nations, the independence of the IAEA as an independent monitor was compromised beyond use because, well, it became dependent upon the largess of nuclear armed aggressive countries for its existence. This torpedoed the Third Pillar of the NPT laying out proper terms for use of civilian nuclear technology as a right of nations....because the adherence to those terms became a political football where nuclear arms suppliers dictated the terms of treaty compliance ( they were unilaterally varied against the agreement of signatory nations ).
So now 'righteous' arms suppliers penalize proponents of disarmament with economic warfare while claiming they are not fulfilling terms of agreements they themselves proposed and agreed to !...which nuclear states do not consider for themselves.
The problem is more that they do.
Which is why this
TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » The NPT and the Nuclear Power TRAP
http://www.transcend.org/tms/2010/05/the-npt-and-the-nuclear-power-trap/
http://opitslinkfest.blogspot.ca/2012/04/19-april-nuclear-politics.html ( below )
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/12821/what_are_irans_intentions

Nuclear Politics

The Suicide Of Western CultureThe Suicide Of Western Culture (Photo credit: Passetti)International March for a Nuclear-Free Future ...International March for a Nuclear-Free Future 2010 - Times square to UN, Manhattan NYC - 05/02/10 (Photo credit: asterix611)WE177 Nuclear WeaponWE177 Nuclear Weapon (Photo credit: Gene Hunt)Don't Attack Iran petitions at White House, No...Don't Attack Iran petitions at White House, November 8, 2006 (Photo credit:Cheryl Biren)Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics ...Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear (Image via RottenTomatoes.com)Cure parasites with natural remedies

https://twitter.com/#!/search/%23Food

The Power of Nightmares : the Politics of Fear

Global Civilisation - the Options 
Reporter: “What do you think of Western civilisation, Mr Gandhi?” Mohandas Gandhi: “I think it would be a good idea.” The quote is probably apocryphal, but if the Mahatma didn’t say it, he should have.

Roots of War : Darwin,Rousseau and Hobbes 
All serious discussions about the role of war in human societies, and especially about its inevitability or otherwise, quickly bring us back to the question of origins. We know that organised war been the constant companion of civilisation from the start of recorded history..... If war is just another artifact of civilisation, then we can deal with it as easily as we have dealt with slavery and the oppression of women B which is to say: only with very great difficulty and over a long period of time, but it can theoretically be done. However, if it should turn out that warfare of a less formal but no less brutal sort extends far back into the pre-civilised and even the pre-human past, then the worrisome possibility arises that war may be an inescapable part of our genetic heritage. That would be a truly discouraging thought, but I=m afraid we do have to consider it. 

Reason to Attack Iran 
There is something comic about two nuclear-armedcountries (5,000-plus nuclear weapons for the US, around 200 forIsrael) declaring that it is vital to prevent a third country from getting a few of the things too. Particularly when that third country, Iran, has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and still abides by it, while Israel has always refused to sign it. 

 Translation : attack Iran so they know they NEED nuclear weapons. Meanwhile everyone posting 'analysis'  ignores - among other things - Russian WMD barring the door to pushback free aggression.  Remember

This fact was officially accepted in a military doctrine known as Mutual Assured Destruction, a.k.a. MAD. MutualAssured Destruction began to emerge at the end ...
mutual assured destruction n. Severe, unavoidable reciprocal damage that superpowers are likely to inflict on each other 
How silly of me to think of real, verifiable and actual WMD as being more concern than a suspicion of a possibility known not to exist for decades 
  
Feb 27, 2012 ... Russia opposes Iran developing nuclear-weapons capability because it would endanger global stability, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said.
But what possible input could the nation that supplies reactors, technical support andfissionable materials have into the situation ?
Attack Iran and you attack Russia By Pepe Escobar ... Ahmadinejad, Iran's Putin?
www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ26Ak06.html
... stated that it will not allow its territory to be used by Israel to launch an attack on neighboring Iran. ... Just as in 2008, Putin will not ... Iran says P5+1 remarks ...
hamsayeh.net/world/1728-russia-planning-troops

... Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said Russia is concerned about the "growing threat" of anattack on Iran ... Full Story » Russia says opposes new ... UN's Ban: Syria must allow...
news.yahoo.com/russias-putin-warns-against-attacks-iran.
Russia Putin Says NATO Missile System Pointed At ... today there is no threat from Iran or North Korea" and said NATO is not ... Putin said Russia is the only country besides ...
www.rferl.org/content/russia_nato_missile_system_united...

In a blistering attack on Washington, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on ... if these games were not taking place right on Russia's ... Vice-President Accuses Iran ...
www.rttnews.com/1828475/putin-us-pursues-interests..
Japan as a Plutonium Superpower. Gavan McCormack. Introduction ... Outline (1976) and “Guidelines for U.S.-Japan ... 1994-2003 electricity supply increased by: [65] ...
japanfocus.org/-Gavan-McCormack/2602 
Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke concerns ... in determining whether Japan's nuclear disaster unfolds like the U.S. ... testing water and foods supplies ...
www.eetimes.com/.../Plutonium-laced...Japan-s-nuke-concerns 

Japan continues to use plutonium because there is no guarantee of a stable supply of low-price ... the majority of Japan's plutonium is enriched in the United States ...
www1.american.edu/projects/mandala/TED/japanpl.htm
Japanese PLUTONIUM-239 in U.S. Milk Supply. Posted in the Indianapolis Forum ... Clouds starting at the destroyed Fukushima Japan Nuclear Multi-Reactor ...
www.topix.com/forum/indy/TMISL8IO7EQ4FCUB9 

Conversation Shows Theists Won’t Allow Freedom Of Religion For Others




The next war - or the next peace ?
Obama has not only eschewed (for the time being) military action against Assad but is at the United Nations urging an internationally sanctioned effort to bring Syria to heel and also a new peace initiative with Iran. Obama may even meet—publicly or privately—new Iranian president Hassan Rouhani—late today.


  • Avatar


    tko 

    It would be about time he actually did something to earn that Nobel Peace Prize he was already awarded.


    • Avatar


      opit  tko 

      .That would require something already noted as more lacking in the reality than in the advertising : substance. Not that U.S. foreign policy is not set in stone on Iran to get them to do something they have pressed for countries in the middle east for years ; stay out of the nuclear munitions business and-or disarm. You will look hard indeed to find analysis which notes Iran was a co-founder of the NPT. Or mention that control of their assets is so mixed up with Russian supply and oversight that the Russians regard it as essentially theirs. Which is especially interesting in terms of free inspections to show they do not have weapons which have gone on for decades. In other words - sanctions are based on bullshit. Don`t just take my word for it.http://www.campaigniran.org/ca...
      http://www.transcend.org/tms/2...
      http://rehmat1.com/2012/06/09/...
      Current status - the US is performing ongoing acts of war against Iran: blockade and confiscation of assets.

      .
Enhanced by Zemanta

No comments: